|
In order
to approximate your level of Spanish in the areas of
speaking, listening, reading and writing, we ask you
to self-evaluate your current skill level.
These proficiency guidelines are
provided by The American
Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages and are
a product of grants from the U.S. Department
of Education.
GENERIC
DESCRIPTIONS - SPEAKING (Revised 1999)
| Speaking
Superior |
Speakers
at the Superior level are able to communicate
in the language with accuracy and fluency in order to participate
fully and effectively in conversations on a variety
of topics in formal and informal settings from
both concrete and abstract perspectives. They
discuss their interests and special fields of
competence, explain complex matters in detail,
and provide lengthy and coherent narrations, all
with ease, fluency, and accuracy. They explain
their opinions on a number of topics of importance
to them, such as social and political issues,
and provide structured argument to support their
opinions. They are able to construct and
develop hypotheses to explore alternative possibilities.
When appropriate, they use extended discourse
without unnaturally lengthy hesitation to make
their point, even when engaged in abstract elaborations.
Such discourse, while coherent, may still be influenced
by the Superior speakers' own language patterns,
rather than those of the target language.
Superior
speakers command a variety of interactive and
discourse strategies, such as turn-taking and
separating main ideas from supporting information
through the use of syntactic and lexical devices, as well
as intonational features such as pitch,
stress and tone. They demonstrate virtually no
pattern of error in the use of basic structures.
However, they may make sporadic errors, particularly
in low-frequency structures and in some complex
high-frequency structures more common to formal
speech and writing. Such errors, if they do occur,
do not distract the native interlocutor or interfere with communication.
|
|
Speaking
Advanced
High |
Speakers
at the Advanced-High level perform all Advanced-level
tasks with linguistic ease, confidence and competence.
They are able to consistently explain in detail
and narrate fully and accurately in all time frames.
In addition, Advanced- High speakers handle the
tasks pertaining to the Superior level but cannot
sustain performance at that level across a variety
of topics. They can provide a structured argument
to support their opinions, and they may construct
hypotheses, but patterns of error appear. They
can discuss some topics abstractly, especially
those relating to their particular interests and
special fields of expertise, but in general, they
are more comfortable discussing a variety of topics
concretely.
Advanced-High speakers may demonstrate
a well-developed ability to compensate for an
imperfect grasp of some forms r for limitations
in vocabulary by the confident use of communicative
strategies, such as paraphrasing, circumlocution,
and illustration. They use precise vocabulary
and intonation to express meaning and often show
great fluency and ease of speech. However, when
called on to perform the complex tasks associated
with the Superior level over a variety of topics,
their language will at times break down or prove
inadequate, or they may avoid the task altogether,
for example, by resorting to simplification through
the use of description or narration in place of
argument or hypothesis.
|
| Speaking
Advanced
Mid |
Speakers at the Advanced-Mid level are
able to handle with ease and confidence a large
number of communicative tasks. They participate
actively in most informal and some formal exchanges
on a variety of concrete topics relating to work,
school, home, and leisure activities, as well
as to events of current, public, and personal
interest or individual relevance.
Advanced-Mid speakers demonstrate
the ability to narrate and describe in all major
time frames (past, present, and future) by providing
a full account, with good control of aspect, as
they adapt flexibly to the demands of the conversation.
Narration and description tend to be combined
and interwoven to relate relevant and supporting
facts in connected, paragraph-length discourse.
Advanced-Mid speakers can handle
successfully and with relative ease the linguistic
challenges presented by a complication or unexpected
turn of events that occurs within the context
of a routine situation or communicative task with
which they are otherwise familiar. Communicative
strategies such as circumlocution or rephrasing
are often employed for this purpose. The speech
of Advanced-Mid speakers performing Advanced-level
tasks is marked by substantial flow. Their vocabulary
is fairly extensive although primarily generic
in nature, except in the case of a particular
area of specialization or interest. Dominant language
discourse structures tend to recede, although
discourse may still reflect the oral paragraph
structure of their own language rather than that
of the target language.
Advanced-Mid speakers contribute
to conversations on a variety of familiar topics,
dealt with concretely, with much accuracy, clarity
and precision, and they convey their intended
message without misrepresentation or confusion.
They are readily understood by native speakers
unaccustomed to dealing with non-natives. When
called on to perform functions or handle topics
associated with the Superior level, the quality
and/or quantity of their speech will generally
decline.
Advanced-Mid speakers are often
able to state an opinion or cite conditions; however,
they lack the ability to consistently provide
a structured argument in extended discourse. Advanced-Mid
speakers may use a number of delaying strategies,
resort to narration, description, explanation
or anecdote, or simply attempt to avoid the linguistic
demands of Superior-level tasks. |
| Speaking
Advanced
Low |
Speakers at the Advanced-Low level are
able to handle a variety of communicative tasks,
although somewhat haltingly at times. They participate
actively in most informal and a limited number
of formal conversations on activities related
to school, home, and leisure activities and, to
a lesser degree, those related to events of work,
current, public, and personal interest or individual
relevance.
Advanced-Low speakers demonstrate
the ability to narrate and describe in all major
time frames (past, present and future) in paragraph
length discourse, but control of aspect may be
lacking at times. They can handle appropriately
the linguistic challenges presented by a complication
or unexpected turn of events that occurs within
the context of a routine situation or communicative
task with which they are otherwise familiar, though
at times their discourse may be minimal for the
level and strained. Communicative strategies such
as rephrasing and circumlocution may be employed
in such instances. In their narrations and descriptions,
they combine and link sentences into connected
discourse of paragraph length. When pressed for
a fuller account, they tend to grope and rely
on minimal discourse. Their utterances are typically
not longer than a single paragraph. Structure
of the dominant language is still evident in the
use of false cognates, literal translations, or
the oral paragraph structure of the speaker's
own language rather than that of the target language.
While the language of Advanced-Low
speakers may be marked by substantial, albeit
irregular flow, it is typically somewhat strained
and tentative, with noticeable self-correction
and a certain 'grammatical roughness.' The vocabulary
of Advanced-Low speakers is primarily generic
in nature.
Advanced-Low speakers contribute
to the conversation with sufficient accuracy,
clarity, and precision to convey their intended
message without misrepresentation or confusion,
and it can be understood by native speakers unaccustomed
to dealing with non-natives, even though this
may be achieved through repetition and restatement.
When attempting to perform functions or handle
topics associated with the Superior level, the
linguistic quality and quantity of their speech
will deteriorate significantly. |
|
Speaking
Intermediate
High |
Intermediate-High
speakers are able to converse with ease and confidence
when dealing with most routine tasks and social
situations of the Intermediate level. They are
able to handle successfully many uncomplicated
tasks and social situations requiring an exchange
of basic information related to work, school,
recreation, particular interests and areas of
competence, though hesitation and errors may be
evident.
Intermediate-High speakers handle
the tasks pertaining to the Advanced level, but
they are unable to sustain performance at that
level over a variety of topics. With some consistency,
speakers at the Intermediate High level narrate
and describe in major time frames using connected
discourse of paragraph length. However, their
performance of these Advanced-level tasks will
exhibit one or more features of breakdown, such
as the failure to maintain the narration or description
semantically or syntactically in the appropriate
major time frame, the disintegration of connected
discourse, the misuse of cohesive devises, a reduction
in breadth and appropriateness of vocabulary,
the failure to successfully circumlocute, or a
significant amount of hesitation.
Intermediate-High speakers can
generally be understood by native speakers unaccustomed
to dealing with non-natives, although the dominant
language is still evident (e.g. use of code-switching,
false cognates, literal translations, etc.), and
gaps in communication may occur. |
|
Speaking
IntermediateMid
|
Speakers
at the Intermediate-Mid level are able to handle
successfully a variety of uncomplicated communicative
tasks in straightforward social situations. Conversation
is generally limited to those predictable and
concrete exchanges necessary for survival in the
target culture; these include personal information
covering self, family, home, daily activities,
interests and personal preferences, as well as
physical and social needs, such as food, shopping,
travel and lodging.
Intermediate-Mid speakers tend
to function reactively, for example, by responding
to direct questions or requests for information.
However, they are capable of asking a variety
of questions when necessary to obtain simple information
to satisfy basic needs, such as directions, prices
and services. When called on to perform functions
or handle topics at the Advanced level, they provide
some information but have difficulty linking ideas,
manipulating time and aspect, and using communicative
strategies, such as circumlocution.
Intermediate-Mid speakers are
able to express personal meaning by creating with
the language, in part by combining and recombining
known elements and conversational input to make
utterances of sentence length and some strings
of sentences. Their speech may contain pauses,
reformulations and self-corrections as they search
for adequate vocabulary and appropriate language
forms to express themselves. Because of inaccuracies
in their vocabulary and/or pronunciation and/or
grammar and/or syntax, misunderstandings can occur,
but Intermediate-Mid speakers are generally understood
by sympathetic interlocutors accustomed to dealing
with non-natives. |
|
Speaking
Intermediate Low |
Speakers
at the Intermediate-Low level are able to handle
successfully a limited number of uncomplicated
communicative tasks by creating with the language
in straightforward social situations. Conversation
is restricted to some of the concrete exchanges
and predictable topics necessary for survival
in the target language culture. These topics relate
to basic personal information covering, for example,
self and family, some daily activities and personal
preferences, as well as to some immediate needs,
such as ordering food and making simple purchases.
At the Intermediate-Low level, speakers are primarily
reactive and struggle to answer direct questions
or requests for information, but they are also
able to ask a few appropriate questions.
Intermediate-Low speakers express
personal meaning by combining and recombining
into short statements what they know and what
they hear from their interlocutors. Their utterances
are often filled with hesitancy and inaccuracies
as they search for appropriate linguistic forms
and vocabulary while attempting to give form to
the message. Their speech is characterized by
frequent pauses, ineffective reformulations and
self-corrections. Their pronunciation, vocabulary
and syntax are strongly influenced by their first
language but, in spite of frequent misunderstandings
that require repetition or rephrasing, Intermediate-Low
speakers can generally be understood by sympathetic
interlocutors, particularly by those accustomed
to dealing with non-natives. |
|
Speaking
Novice
High |
Speakers
at the Novice-High level are able to handle a
variety of tasks pertaining to the Intermediate
level, but are unable to sustain performance at
that level. They are able to manage successfully
a number of uncomplicated communicative tasks
in straightforward social situations. Conversation
is restricted to a few of the predictable topics
necessary for survival in the target language
culture, such as basic personal information, basic
objects and a limited number of activities, preferences
and immediate needs. Novice-High speakers respond
to simple, direct questions or requests for information;
they are able to ask only a very few formulaic
questions when asked to do so.
Novice-High speakers are able
to express personal meaning by relying heavily
on learned phrases or recombinations of these
and what they hear from their interlocutor. Their
utterances, which consist mostly of short and
sometimes complete sentences in the present, may
be hesitant or inaccurate. On the other hand,
since these utterances are frequently only expansions
of learned material and stock phrases, they may
sometimes appear surprisingly fluent and accurate.
These speakers' first language may strongly influence
their pronunciation, as well as their vocabulary
and syntax when they attempt to personalize their
utterances. Frequent misunderstandings may arise
but, with repetition or rephrasing, Novice-High
speakers can generally be understood by sympathetic
interlocutors used to non-natives. When called
on to handle simply a variety of topics and perform
functions pertaining to the Intermediate level,
a Novice-High speaker can sometimes respond in
intelligible sentences, but will not be able to
sustain sentence level discourse. |
|
Speaking
Novice
Mid |
Speakers
at the Novice-Mid level communicate minimally
and with difficulty by using a number of isolated
words and memorized phrases limited by the particular
context in which the language has been learned.
When responding to direct questions, they may
utter only two or three words at a time or an
occasional stock answer. They pause frequently
as they search for simple vocabulary or attempt
to recycle their own and their interlocutor's
words. Because of hesitations, lack of vocabulary,
inaccuracy, or failure to respond appropriately,
Novice-Mid speakers may be understood with great
difficulty even by sympathetic interlocutors accustomed
to dealing with non-natives. When called on to
handle topics by performing functions associated
with the Intermediate level, they frequently resort
to repetition, words from their native language,
or silence. |
|
Speaking
Novice
Low |
Speakers
at the Novice-Low level have no real functional
ability and, because of their pronunciation, they
may be unintelligible. Given adequate time and
familiar cues, they may be able to exchange greetings,
give their identity, and name a number of familiar
objects from their immediate environment. They
are unable to perform functions or handle topics
pertaining to the Intermediate level, and cannot
therefore participate in a true conversational
exchange.
|
GENERIC
DESCRIPTIONS - LISTENING (1986)
These guidelines assume that all listening
tasks take place in an authentic environment at a normal
rate of speech using standard or near-standard norms.
|
Novice
Low
Listening |
Understanding is limited to
occasional isolated words, such as cognates, borrowed
words, and high-frequency social conventions.
Essentially no ability to comprehend even short
utterances.
|
|
Novice
Mid
Listening |
Able to understand some short,
learned utterances, particularly where context
strongly supports understanding and speech is
clearly audible. Comprehends some words and phrases
from simple questions, statements, high-frequency
commands and courtesy formulae about topics that
refer to basic personal information or the immediate
physical setting. The listener requires long pauses
for assimilation and periodically requests repetition
and/or a slower rate of speech.
|
|
Novice
High
Listening |
Able to understand short, learned
utterances and some sentence-length utterances,
particularly where context strongly supports understanding
and speech is clearly audible. Comprehends words
and phrases from simple questions, statements,
high frequency commands and courtesy formulae.
May require repetition, rephrasing and/or a slowed
rate of speech for comprehension.
|
|
Intermediate
Low
Listening |
Able to understand sentence-length
utterances which consist of recombinations of
learned elements in a limited number of content
areas, particularly if strongly supported by the
situational context. Content refers to basic personal
background and needs, social conventions and routine
tasks, such as getting meals and receiving simple
instructions and directions. Listening tasks pertain
primarily to spontaneous face-to-face conversations.
Understanding is often uneven; repetition and
rewording may be necessary. Misunderstandings
in both main ideas and details arise frequently.
|
|
Intermediate
Mid
Listening |
Able to understand sentence-length
utterances which consist of recombinations of
learned utterances on a variety of topics. Content
continues to refer primarily to basic personal
background and needs, social conventions and somewhat
more complex tasks, such as lodging, transportation,
and shopping. Additional content areas include
some personal interests and activities, and a
greater diversity of instructions and directions.
Listening tasks not only pertain to spontaneous
face-to-face conversations but also to short routine
telephone conversations and some deliberate speech,
such as simple announcements and reports over
the media. Understanding continues to be uneven.
|
|
Intermediate
High
Listening |
Able to sustain understanding
over longer stretches of connected discourse on
a number of topics pertaining to different times
and places; however, understanding is inconsistent
due to failure to grasp main ideas and/or details.
Thus, while topics do not differ significantly
from those of an Advanced level listener, comprehension
is less in quantity and poorer in quality.
|
|
Advanced
Listening |
Able to understand main ideas
and most details of connected discourse on a variety
of topics beyond the immediacy of the situation.
Comprehension may be uneven due to a variety of
linguistic and extralinguistic factors, among
which topic familiarity is very prominent. These
texts frequently involve description and narration
in different time frames or aspects, such as present,
nonpast, habitual, or imperfective. Texts may
include interviews, short lectures on familiar
topics and news items and reports primarily dealing
with factual information. Listener is aware of
cohesive devices but may not be able to use them
to follow the sequence of thought in an oral text.
|
|
Advanced
High
Listening |
Able to understand the main
ideas of most speech in a standard dialect; however,
the listener may not be able to sustain comprehension
in extended discourse which is propositionally
and linguistically complex. Listener shows an
emerging awareness of culturally implied meanings
beyond the surface meanings of the text but may
fail to grasp sociocultural nuances of the message.
|
|
Superior
Listening |
Able to understand the main
ideas of all speech in a standard dialect, including
technical discussion in a field of specialization.
Can follow the essentials of extended discourse
which is propositionally and linguistically complex,
as in academic/professional settings, in lectures,
speeches, and reports. Listener shows some appreciation
of aesthetic norms of target language, of idioms,
colloquialisms and register shifting. Able to
make inferences within the cultural framework
of the target language. Understanding is aided
by an awareness of the underlying organizational
structure of the oral text and includes sensitivity
for its social and cultural references and its
affective overtones. Rarely misunderstands but
may not understand excessively rapid, highly colloquial
speech or speech that has strong cultural references.
|
GENERIC
DESCRIPTIONS - READING (1986)
These guidelines assume all reading
texts to be authentic and legible.
|
Novice
Low
Reading |
Able occasionally to identify
isolated words and/or major phrases when strongly
supported by context. |
|
Novice
Mid
Reading |
Able to recognize the symbols
of an alphabetic and/or syllabic writing system
and/or a limited number of characters in a system
that uses characters. The reader can identify
an increasing number of highly contextualized
words and/or phrases including cognates and borrowed
words, where appropriate. Material understood
rarely exceeds a single phrase at a time, and
rereading may be required.
|
|
Novice
High
Reading |
Has sufficient control of the
writing system to interpret written language in
areas of practical need. Where vocabulary has
been learned, can read for instructional and directional
purposes standardized messages, phrases or expressions,
such as some items on menus, schedules, timetables,
maps, and signs. At times, but not on a consistent
basis, the Novice-High level reader may be able
to derive meaning from material at a slightly
higher level where context and/or extralinguistic
background knowledge are supportive.
|
|
Intermediate
Low
Reading |
Able to understand main ideas
and/or some facts from the simplest connected
texts dealing with basic personal and social needs.
Such texts are linguistically noncomplex and have
a clear underlying internal structure, for example
chronological sequencing. They impart basic information
about which the reader has to make only minimal
suppositions or to which the reader brings personal
interest and/or knowledge. Examples include messages
with social purposes or information for- the widest
possible audience, such as public announcements
and short, straightforward instructions dealing
with public life. Some misunderstandings will
occur.
|
|
Intermediate
Mid
Reading |
Able to read consistently with
increased understanding simple connected texts
dealing with a variety of basic and social needs.
Such texts are still linguistically noncomplex
and have a clear underlying internal structure.
They impart basic information about which the
reader has to make minimal suppositions and to
which the reader brings personal interest and/or
knowledge. Examples may include short, straightforward
descriptions of persons, places, and things written
for a wide audience.
|
|
Intermediate
High
Reading |
Able to read consistently with
full understanding simple connected texts dealing
with basic personal and social needs about which
the reader has personal interest and/or knowledge.
Can get some main ideas and information from texts
at the next higher level featuring description
and narration. Structural complexity may interfere
with comprehension; for example, basic grammatical
relations may be misinterpreted and temporal references
may rely primarily on lexical items. Has some
difficulty with the cohesive factors in discourse,
such as matching pronouns with referents. While
texts do not differ significantly from those at
the Advanced level, comprehension is less consistent.
May have to read material several times for understanding.
|
|
Advanced
Reading |
Able to read somewhat longer
prose of several paragraphs in length, particularly
if presented with a clear underlying structure.
The prose is predominantly in familiar sentence
patterns. Reader gets the main ideas and facts
and misses some details. Comprehension derives
not only from situational and subject matter knowledge
but from increasing control of the language. Texts
at this level include descriptions and narrations
such as simple short stories, news items, bibliographical
information, social notices, personal correspondence,
routinized business letters and simple technical
material written for the general reader. |
|
Advanced
High
Reading |
Able to follow essential points
of written discourse at the Superior level in
areas of special interest or knowledge. Able to
understand parts of texts which are conceptually
abstract and linguistically complex, and/or texts
which treat unfamiliar topics and situations,
as well as some texts which involve aspects of
target-language culture. Able to comprehend the
facts to make appropriate inferences. An emerging
awareness of the aesthetic properties of language
and of its literary styles permit comprehension
of a wider variety of texts, including literary.
Misunderstandings may occur.
|
|
Superior |
Able to read with almost complete
comprehension and at normal speed expository prose
on unfamiliar subjects and a variety of literary
texts. Reading ability is not dependent on subject
matter knowledge, although the reader is not expected
to comprehend thoroughly texts which are highly
dependent on knowledge of the target culture.
Reads easily for pleasure. Superior-level texts
feature hypotheses, argumentation and supported
opinions and include grammatical patterns and
vocabulary ordinarily encountered in academic/professional
reading. At this level, due to the control of
general vocabulary and structure, the reader is
almost always able to match the meanings derived
from extralinguistic knowledge with meanings derived
from the knowledge of the language, allowing for
smooth and efficient reading of diverse texts.
Occasional misunderstandings may still occur;
for example, the reader may experience some difficulty
with unusually complex structures and low-frequency
idioms. At the Superior level the reader can match
strategies, top-down or bottom-up, which are most
appropriate to the text. (Top-down strategies
rely on real-world knowledge and prediction based
on genre and organizational scheme of the text.
Bottom-up strategies rely on actual linguistic
knowledge.) Material at this level will include
a variety of literary texts, editorials, correspondence,
general reports and technical material in professional
fields. Rereading is rarely necessary, and misreading
is rare. |
GENERIC
DESCRIPTIONS - WRITING (1986)
|
Novice
Low
Writing |
Able to form some letters in
an alphabetic system. In languages whose writing
systems use syllabaries or characters, writer
is able to both copy and produce the basic strokes.
Can produce romanization of isolated characters,
where applicable. |
|
Novice
Mid
Writing |
Able to copy or transcribe familiar
words or phrases and reproduce some from memory.
No practical communicative writing skills.
|
|
Novice
High
Writing |
Able to write simple fixed expressions
and limited memorized material and some recombinations
thereof. Can supply information on simple forms
and documents. Can write names, numbers, dates,
own nationality, and other simple autobiographical
information as well as some short phrases and
simple lists. Can write all the symbols in an
alphabetic or syllabic system or 50-100 characters
or compounds in a character writing system: Spelling
and representation of symbols (letters, syllables,
characters) may be partially correct.
|
|
Intermediate
Low
Writing |
Able to meet limited practical
writing needs. Can write short messages, postcards,
and take down simple notes, such as telephone
messages. Can create statements or questions within
the scope of limited language experience. Material
produced consists of recombinations of learned
vocabulary and structures into simple sentences
on very familiar topics. Language is inadequate
to express in writing anything but elementary
needs. Frequent errors in grammar, vocabulary,
punctuation, spelling and in formation of nonalphabetic
symbols, but writing can be understood by natives
used to the writings of nonnatives.
|
|
Intermediate
Mid
Writing |
Able to meet a number of practical
writing needs. Can write short, simple letters.
Content involves personal preferences, daily routine,
everyday events, and other topics grounded in
personal experience. Can express present time
or at least one other time frame or aspect consistently,
e.g., nonpast, habitual, imperfective. Evidence
of control of the syntax of noncomplex sentences
and basic inflectional morphology, such as declensions
and conjugation. Writing tends to be a loose collection
of sentences or sentence fragments on a given
topic and provides little evidence of conscious
organization. Can be understood by natives used
to the writing of nonnatives.
|
|
Intermediate
High
Writing |
Able to meet most practical
writing needs and limited social demands. Can
take notes in some detail on familiar topics and
respond in writing to personal questions. Can
write simple letters, brief synopses and paraphrases,
summaries of biographical data, work and school
experience. In those languages relying primarily
on content words and time expressions to express
time, tense, or aspect, some precision is displayed;
where tense and/or aspect is expressed through
verbal inflection, forms are produced rather consistently,
but not always accurately. An ability to describe
and narrate in paragraphs is emerging. Rarely
uses basic cohesive elements, such as pronominal
substitutions or synonyms in written discourse.
Writing, though faulty, is generally comprehensible
to natives used to the writing of nonnatives.
|
|
Advanced
Writing |
Able to write routine social
correspondence and join sentences in simple discourse
of at least several paragraphs in length on familiar
topics. Can write simple social correspondence,
take notes, write cohesive summaries and resumes,
as well as narratives and descriptions of a factual
nature. Has sufficient writing vocabulary to express
self simply with some circumlocution. May still
make errors in punctuation, spelling, or the formation
of nonalphabetic symbols. Good control of the
morphology and the most frequently used syntactic
structures, e.g., common word order patterns,
coordination, subordination, but makes frequent
errors in producing complex sentences. Uses a
limited number of cohesive devices, such as pronouns,
accurately. Writing may resemble literal translations
from the native language, but a sense of organization
(rhetorical structure) is emerging. Writing is
understandable to natives not used to the writing
of nonnatives.
|
|
Advanced
High
Writing |
Able to write about a variety
of topics with significant precision and in detail.
Can write most social and informal business correspondence.
Can describe and narrate personal experiences
fully but has difficulty supporting points of
view in written discourse. Can write about the
concrete aspects of topics relating to particular
interests and special fields of competence. Often
shows remarkable fluency and ease of expression,
but under time constraints and pressure writing
may be inaccurate. Generally strong in either
grammar or vocabulary, but not in both. Weakness
and unevenness in one of the foregoing or in spelling
or character writing formation may result in occasional
miscommunication. Some misuse of vocabulary may
still be evident. Style may still be obviously
foreign.
|
|
Superior
Writing |
Able to express self effectively
in most formal and informal writing on practical,
social and professional topics. Can write most
types of correspondence, such as memos as well
as social and business letters, and short research
papers and statements of position in areas of
special interest or in special fields. Good control
of a full range of structures, spelling or nonalphabetic
symbol production, and a wide general vocabulary
allow the writer to hypothesize and present arguments
or points of view accurately and effectively.
An underlying organization, such as chronological
ordering, logical ordering, cause and effect,
comparison, and thematic development is strongly
evident, although not thoroughly executed and/or
not totally reflecting target language patterns.
Although sensitive to differences in formal and
informal style, still may not tailor writing precisely
to a variety of purposes and/or readers. Errors
in writing rarely disturb natives or cause miscommunication. |
©
1986, 1999
The American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages,
All Rights Reserved
|